liqsiren

bankruptcy price and liquidation price are not the same line

for a 20x BTC long entered at $97,400, Binance estimates liq at $92,919.60 and bankruptcy at $92,530, leaving a $389.60 execution buffer funded by the 0.4% MMR.

how it's computed

liquidation price is where the engine takes over; bankruptcy price is where position margin reaches zero.

want the alarm instead of the arithmetic? arm the liquidation price alert — it screams before price reaches your liq. free, no signup.

the short version

  • watch the liq, not bankruptcy: a 20x BTC long at $97,400 on Binance is taken over at $92,919.60, and the $389.60 below that belongs to the engine.
  • pick leverage by the room before takeover: $4,480.40 at 20x shrinks to $584.40 at 100x on Binance, while the buffer after it stays $389.60.
  • above $300,000 of BTC notional, check your bracket on the venue: Binance's MMR climbs from 0.4% toward 2%, which lifts a long's liq and liquidates you earlier.

what is the difference between liquidation price and bankruptcy price?

your last line is the liq, not bankruptcy: a 20x Binance long from $97,400 is the engine's below $92,919.60.

read more

liquidation price is the mark-price threshold where the venue’s liquidation engine takes control of your position. bankruptcy price is the level where the position’s allocated margin has been fully consumed. for an isolated long, bankruptcy sits below liquidation. the difference is deliberate: the engine needs price room to close the position before its equity falls below zero and leaves a deficit.

maintenance margin creates that room. under the isolated approximation, a long’s liquidation price includes MMR, while bankruptcy price removes it. the resulting gap is not spare margin you can use after liquidation; control has already passed to the engine. it is an execution buffer intended to let the engine close above bankruptcy, with the insurance fund behind the process if the tape runs through that level.

how do you calculate both prices for a BTC long?

at 20x bankruptcy is $92,530 on both venues; the liq sits entry × MMR above: $389.60 on Binance, $321.42 on Bybit.

a 20x BTC long on Binance, $97,400 entry
bankruptcy$92,530liq$92,919.60entry$97,400$389.60 buffer
read more

for an isolated USDT-M long, the liqsiren approximation is liq = entry × (1 − 1/leverage + MMR). bankruptcy price is entry × (1 − 1/leverage). using the worked-example entry of $97,400, 20x bankruptcy is $97,400 × (1 − 1/20) = $92,530. at 100x it is $97,400 × (1 − 1/100) = $96,426.

the liq-to-bankruptcy buffer equals entry × MMR while the position stays inside the same maintenance bracket. Binance BTC uses 0.4% MMR at the $10,000 worked-example notional, giving $97,400 × 0.4% = $389.60. Bybit uses 0.33%, giving $97,400 × 0.33% = $321.42. these are estimates — exchanges compute exact liq from live margin; always double-check on your venue.

show the table
20x and 100x BTC long takeover and bankruptcy levels
venue and leverageentryestimated liq pricebankruptcy priceliq-to-bankruptcy gapgap as % of entry
Binance 20x$97,400$92,919.60$92,530$389.600.4%
Bybit 20x$97,400$92,851.42$92,530$321.420.33%
Binance 100x$97,400$96,815.60$96,426$389.600.4%
Bybit 100x$97,400$96,747.42$96,426$321.420.33%

worked examples and USDT-M isolated-margin brackets from Binance, Bybit and the liqsiren audit, verified 2026-09-19; entry fixed at the BTC mark used for the example on 2026-09-22.

does the liquidation-to-bankruptcy gap shrink as leverage rises?

the buffer stays $389.60 on Binance at 20x and 100x; what shrinks is your room before takeover: $4,480.40 down to $584.40.

Binance BTC long, $97,400 entry: room before takeover vs buffer after
20x entry to liq$4,480.4020x buffer$389.60100x entry to liq$584.40100x buffer$389.60
read more

not within the same MMR bracket under this isolated approximation. leverage compresses the full adverse move from entry to bankruptcy, but the liq-to-bankruptcy gap remains entry × MMR. at the $97,400 BTC entry, Binance keeps a $389.60 buffer at both 20x and 100x; Bybit keeps $321.42. a bracket change, live fee or funding accrual, added margin, or another venue-specific adjustment can move the exact figures.

what shrinks sharply is your pre-takeover distance. the Binance 20x long has $4,480.40, or 4.6%, between entry and estimated liq; at 100x it has $584.40, or 0.6%. Bybit moves from $4,548.58, or 4.67%, at 20x to $652.58, or 0.67%, at 100x. once takeover occurs, only the MMR-created buffer remains before bankruptcy.

show the table
how leverage compresses the move available before and after takeover
venue and leverageentry-to-bankruptcy moveentry-to-liq movepost-takeover buffer
Binance 20x$4,870 / 5%$4,480.40 / 4.6%$389.60 / 0.4%
Bybit 20x$4,870 / 5%$4,548.58 / 4.67%$321.42 / 0.33%
Binance 100x$974 / 1%$584.40 / 0.6%$389.60 / 0.4%
Bybit 100x$974 / 1%$652.58 / 0.67%$321.42 / 0.33%

plain arithmetic from the BTC worked examples and venue MMR brackets verified 2026-09-19; example entry dated 2026-09-22.

why can notional change the gap even when leverage does not?

a bigger position can cross $300,000 into a higher MMR bracket: the buffer widens, but your liq moves toward entry.

read more

MMR is bracket-dependent, so notional can change the takeover buffer without any leverage change. Binance BTC begins at 0.4% MMR up to $300,000 notional, then moves through 0.5%, 0.65%, 1% and 2% in the first five listed brackets. Bybit BTC starts at 0.33% up to $300,000, followed by 0.5%, 0.56%, 0.63% and 0.67%.

a larger MMR moves a long’s liquidation price upward while bankruptcy price remains set by entry and leverage in the simplified isolated calculation. that gives the engine more price distance between takeover and zero equity, but it also liquidates you earlier. only the first five tiers are listed here. beyond the last listed bracket, liqsiren’s fallback slightly underestimates MMR, so large notionals require a venue-side check.

show the table
first five BTC maintenance-margin brackets
venue and bracket ceilingMMRmaximum leverage
Binance — $300,0000.4%150x
Binance — $800,0000.5%100x
Binance — $3,000,0000.65%75x
Binance — $12,000,0001%50x
Binance — $70,000,0002%25x
Bybit — $300,0000.33%150x
Bybit — $2,000,0000.5%100x
Bybit — $2,600,0000.56%90x
Bybit — $3,200,0000.63%80x
Bybit — $3,800,0000.67%75x

Binance leverage-margin bracket data and Bybit v5 market risk-limit rows, verified 2026-09-19.

what happens if the engine cannot close above bankruptcy price?

your isolated margin is already spent; the insurance fund takes the shortfall, and past it the venue can auto-deleverage profitable opposing positions.

read more

if the liquidation engine gets a fill above bankruptcy on a long, the MMR buffer has done its job: takeover happened before position equity reached zero. if the book gaps, thins or wicks through bankruptcy before enough size can be closed, execution can land below the zero-equity line. the resulting shortfall is no longer covered by the liquidated position’s own isolated margin.

the insurance fund is the next loss-absorption layer. if that layer cannot absorb the remaining deficit, the venue can proceed to auto-deleveraging, reducing opposing profitable positions under its venue-specific priority process. exact insurance-fund balances and ADL ordering are not supplied here and vary by venue. bankruptcy price therefore marks a real handoff point between position equity, liquidation execution and shared backstop mechanisms.

which price should you compare with the candle or stop trigger?

compare the venue's mark with the liq estimate, not bankruptcy; then check on the account which series your stop triggers on.

read more

compare the venue’s mark with the liquidation estimate, not bankruptcy price, when reconstructing why control passed to the engine. bankruptcy is the zero-equity reference used after takeover; it is not the initial liquidation trigger. last-traded price can print somewhere else because mark and last are different series. no mark-price formula weights, constituent counts or update frequencies are assumed here.

stops, take-profits and conditional orders need a separate trigger check. trigger type is selectable and varies by product and interface, so verify the selection on the account rather than assuming a default. a stop watching one price series and liquidation watching mark can produce a sequence where the engine acts before the stop condition is observed on the series you were viewing.

  1. record the venue, contract, side, margin mode, entry, notional and leverage.
  2. capture mark, last and the selected conditional-order trigger series separately.
  3. identify the active MMR bracket rather than applying the first tier to every notional.
  4. calculate both takeover and bankruptcy levels, then measure the price gap between them.
  5. include funding, fees and margin changes when reconciling the estimate with the venue’s live figure.

is bankruptcy price visible in real liquidation data?

OKX and Bybit publish the bankruptcy price on every forced close; Binance and Hyperliquid don't, so there you only have the formula.

read more

yes, on two venues. OKX publishes forced liquidations on a public endpoint that carries bkPx, the bankruptcy price of the position, on every print; that endpoint was probed on 2026-09-23 and answered. Bybit publishes one too: its allLiquidation stream carries p, documented as the bankruptcy price, on every print — the field table was read on 2026-09-23. Binance forceOrder carries no such field and Hyperliquid publishes no liquidation stream at all, which is why liqsiren stores bankruptcy price in a nullable column where NULL means the venue publishes none. that makes bankruptcy price a directly recordable field rather than only a theoretical output from the isolated formula.

liqsiren’s own tape carries OKX rows only from 2026-09-23, the day that collector was deployed; there is no OKX history before that date and none was backfilled, so a window opening earlier holds none. Bybit rows also begin on 2026-09-23: until that day the collector read Bybit’s allLiquidation frames against the wrong schema and dropped every one, and nothing from before the fix was backfilled. every Bybit row since carries the venue’s bankruptcy price, so the tape holds venue-published bankruptcy prices from two venues — but only from that date, not as a longer history.

the tape records Binance and Hyperliquid prints from 2026-09-19, and Binance throttles its forceOrder stream, so no single public source sees every liquidation on every venue. liqsiren can record available prints and calculate an estimated liq from real brackets, but exact takeover remains a live-margin result computed by the exchange.

what this page adds that the others don't

show all 7
  • a $97,400 BTC long has bankruptcy at $92,530 on 20x and $96,426 on 100x, independent of whether the worked example uses Binance or Bybit.
  • Binance’s 0.4% first-tier BTC MMR creates a $389.60 liq-to-bankruptcy gap at the $97,400 entry.
  • Bybit’s 0.33% first-tier BTC MMR creates a $321.42 gap, which is $68.18 narrower than the Binance example.
  • at 100x, Binance takeover is estimated 0.6% below entry while Bybit takeover is estimated 0.67% below entry.
  • Binance BTC MMR rises from 0.4% to 2% across the first five listed brackets, changing the engine’s buffer as notional crosses tiers.
  • an execution below bankruptcy can pass a deficit to the insurance fund and, beyond that backstop, to the venue’s ADL mechanism.
  • OKX publishes bkPx on every forced-liquidation print at a public endpoint that answered on 2026-09-23; liqsiren’s own tape has carried OKX rows since that same day and none before it.

faq

is bankruptcy price the price where I get liquidated?

no. liquidation price is the estimated mark threshold where the engine takes control, while bankruptcy price is where the position’s allocated margin reaches zero. for the Binance 20x BTC long entered at $97,400, estimated liq is $92,919.60 and bankruptcy is $92,530, leaving a $389.60 execution buffer.

why is my liquidation price above bankruptcy on a long?

because maintenance margin moves takeover ahead of zero equity. for a long, adding MMR to the isolated liquidation formula places liq above bankruptcy. the engine can then attempt to close inside that gap. at the $10,000 BTC example notional, the gap is 0.4% of entry on Binance and 0.33% on Bybit.

does 100x make the liquidation-to-bankruptcy gap smaller?

not by itself within the same MMR bracket. at the $97,400 entry, Binance’s simplified gap remains $389.60 at both 20x and 100x. what contracts is entry-to-liq distance: $4,480.40 at 20x versus $584.40 at 100x. bracket changes and live account accruals can alter the exact result.

what if price gaps below bankruptcy before the position closes?

the position’s isolated margin cannot cover execution below its bankruptcy level. the insurance fund is the next backstop for the deficit. if that layer is insufficient, the venue can use auto-deleveraging against opposing profitable positions. exact fund balances, prioritisation and implementation are venue-dependent and are not quantified here.

can fees and funding move the exact liquidation price?

yes. the isolated approximation omits the exchange’s fee and funding accruals since entry. Binance’s listed taker fee is 0.05% and Bybit’s is 0.055%, while both use an 8-hour funding interval in this facts set. live margin, accrued funding and execution charges can therefore make the venue’s exact liq differ from the estimate.

can I use the candle low to prove liquidation should not have happened?

not on its own. liquidation should be reconstructed against the venue’s mark series and your live margin state, while the candle may show last-traded price. conditional-order trigger type is selectable and must be checked on the account. bankruptcy price is a post-takeover zero-equity reference, not the trigger you compare with the candle.

sources

  1. Binance futures leverage and margin brackets (the bracket API behind the official page) — checked 2026-09-19
  2. Binance Futures liquidation and maintenance margin documentation — checked 2026-09-19
  3. Bybit v5 market risk-limit endpoint (risk limit / maintenance margin tiers) — checked 2026-09-19
  4. Bybit liquidation process documentation — checked 2026-09-19
  5. liqsiren margin-tier table, verified against both venues — checked 2026-09-19

methodology, coverage gaps and the resolved prediction scorecard live on the would-have-alerted audit. corrections: @ehivedev on Telegram.