liqsiren

how Binance and Bybit calculate liquidation price

for a $10,000 BTC isolated long entered at $97,400, Binance estimates liq at $88,049.60 on 10x using 0.4% MMR; Bybit estimates $87,981.42 using 0.33% MMR.

how it's computed

The core long equation is entry × (1 − 1/leverage + MMR), but live fees, funding and margin can move the venue’s exact result.

want the alarm instead of the arithmetic? arm the liquidation price alert — it screams before price reaches your liq. free, no signup.

the short version

  • at 20x on Binance, a $97,400 BTC long has its liq at $92,919.60, 4.6% below entry — your stop has to sit inside that gap.
  • pick leverage from the room you need: 1 ÷ (distance + MMR), so 5% of room on Binance’s 0.4% bracket means 18.52x or less.
  • recheck the bracket when size grows: past $300,000 notional, Binance BTC goes from 0.4% to 0.5% MMR, pulling the liq toward entry.

what is the isolated-margin liquidation formula?

long liq = entry × (1 − 1/leverage + MMR); plug 20x in as 20 and a 0.4% MMR as 0.004.

read more

for a USDT-M isolated long, the approximation is liq = entry × (1 − 1/leverage + MMR). For an isolated short, it is liq = entry × (1 + 1/leverage − MMR). The long liq sits below entry, while the short liq sits above entry. At a fixed MMR, both have the same percentage distance from entry under this simplified equation.

entry is your average position entry price, leverage is the position’s leverage multiple, and MMR is the maintenance-margin rate for the position’s notional bracket. Leverage must enter the equation as a multiple: 20x means 20, so 1/leverage is 1/20 = 0.05. An MMR of 0.4% enters as 0.004, not 0.4.

notional selects the bracket before the equation is run. A $10,000 Binance BTC position falls inside the bracket up to $300,000, where MMR is 0.4% and maximum leverage is 150x. A $10,000 Bybit BTC position also falls inside its bracket up to $300,000, but that bracket uses 0.33% MMR and maximum leverage of 150x.

how does Binance calculate BTC liquidation at 10x, 20x and 50x?

from $97,400, Binance’s long liq is 9.6% away at 10x, 4.6% at 20x, 1.6% at 50x — keep your stop inside it.

a $10,000 Binance BTC long from a $97,400 entry
10x liq$88,049.6020x liq$92,919.6050x liq$95,841.60entry$97,400$4,480.40 of room
read more

take a $10,000 Binance BTC isolated position with a worked-example entry of $97,400. Its notional is below the first BTC bracket ceiling of $300,000, so MMR is 0.4%, or 0.004. At 10x, the long calculation is $97,400 × (1 − 1/10 + 0.004) = $88,049.60. The short calculation is $97,400 × (1 + 1/10 − 0.004) = $106,750.40.

leverage compresses the available move rapidly. The Binance long has $9,350.40 of room at 10x, $4,480.40 at 20x and $1,558.40 at 50x. As percentages of the $97,400 entry, those distances are 9.6%, 4.6% and 1.6%. The short levels are equally distant above entry under the isolated approximation because each uses the same 0.4% MMR.

show the table
Binance BTC isolated-liq estimates for a $10,000 position entered at $97,400
leverageMMRlong liqshort liqdistance from entry
10x0.4%$88,049.60$106,750.409.6% / $9,350.40
20x0.4%$92,919.60$101,880.404.6% / $4,480.40
50x0.4%$95,841.60$98,958.401.6% / $1,558.40

source: liqsiren worked examples using Binance BTC brackets verified 2026-09-19

why does Bybit give a different BTC liquidation price?

same $97,400 entry, same leverage: Bybit’s 0.33% MMR puts the long liq $68.18 lower than Binance’s 0.4%.

read more

Bybit uses 0.33% MMR for a $10,000 BTC position because the notional sits inside its first bracket, which runs up to $300,000. With the same $97,400 entry, a 10x long becomes $97,400 × (1 − 1/10 + 0.0033) = $87,981.42. The matching short estimate is $106,818.58, leaving 9.67%, or $9,418.58, between entry and estimated liq.

the 0.07 percentage-point MMR gap between Binance at 0.4% and Bybit at 0.33% produces a $68.18 difference at every displayed leverage because $97,400 × (0.004 − 0.0033) = $68.18. Bybit’s estimated long liq is $68.18 lower, while its short liq is $68.18 higher. That difference remains constant here because entry and bracket MMR stay fixed.

show the table
Bybit BTC estimates and the same-leverage difference from Binance
leverageBybit long liqBybit short liqdistancedifference versus Binance
10x$87,981.42$106,818.589.67% / $9,418.58$68.18
20x$92,851.42$101,948.584.67% / $4,548.58$68.18
50x$95,773.42$99,026.581.67% / $1,626.58$68.18

source: liqsiren worked examples using Bybit BTC risk limits verified 2026-09-19

how do maintenance-margin brackets change the answer?

look up your notional’s row: past $300,000 BTC goes to 0.5% MMR on both venues, pulling liq closer at the same leverage.

read more

MMR is not one fixed rate for every BTC position. Binance BTC starts at 0.4% through $300,000 notional, then moves to 0.5% through $800,000 and 0.65% through $3,000,000. Its next listed brackets use 1% through $12,000,000 and 2% through $70,000,000. The listed maximum leverage falls as notional moves through those brackets.

Bybit BTC also starts with a $300,000 ceiling, but its first MMR is 0.33%. The next bracket reaches $2,000,000 at 0.5%, followed by $2,600,000 at 0.56%, $3,200,000 at 0.63% and $3,800,000 at 0.67%. A position that crosses a notional threshold therefore needs the new bracket’s MMR and leverage cap rather than the first-tier value.

only the first 5 brackets are represented in this table and in the supplied calculator bed. For notionals above the final listed bracket, falling back to that last bracket slightly underestimates MMR. That makes the resulting liq estimate too generous, so larger positions require a direct venue check against the account’s live risk limit and maintenance margin.

show the table
first 5 BTC maintenance-margin brackets by venue
venue and tiernotional up toMMRmaximum leverage
Binance tier 1$300,0000.4%150x
Binance tier 2$800,0000.5%100x
Binance tier 3$3,000,0000.65%75x
Binance tier 4$12,000,0001%50x
Binance tier 5$70,000,0002%25x
Bybit tier 1$300,0000.33%150x
Bybit tier 2$2,000,0000.5%100x
Bybit tier 3$2,600,0000.56%90x
Bybit tier 4$3,200,0000.63%80x
Bybit tier 5$3,800,0000.67%75x

source: Binance bracket data and Bybit v5 risk-limit data, verified 2026-09-19

what leverage matches a liquidation distance you can tolerate?

decide the room first, then the leverage: 5% on Binance BTC allows 18.52x, 2% allows 41.67x — never above the bracket cap.

leverage that puts a Binance BTC liq this far from entry, 0.4% MMR
5% from entry18.52x2% from entry41.67x1% from entry71.43x
read more

the isolated formula can be inverted because distance from entry equals 1/leverage − MMR. If your target liquidation distance is d in decimal form, leverage = 1 ÷ (d + MMR). For a 5% target on Binance BTC’s 0.4% bracket, leverage is 1 ÷ (0.05 + 0.004) = 18.52x. This is mathematical leverage, not a position-size or loss limit.

the same 5% target with Bybit BTC’s 0.33% MMR implies 1 ÷ (0.05 + 0.0033) = 18.76x. At a 2% target, the calculations become 1 ÷ 0.024 = 41.67x on Binance and 1 ÷ 0.0233 = 42.92x on Bybit. The lower MMR permits slightly higher mathematical leverage for the same estimated liq distance.

distance inversion is bracket-dependent, so the order of operations matters. Deriving leverage with the first-tier MMR and then increasing notional into a higher bracket invalidates the result. The position’s notional, venue and symbol determine MMR first; only then can the tolerated-distance equation return the matching leverage.

  1. convert the target distance to decimal form, so 2% becomes 0.02.
  2. select the MMR from the position’s venue, symbol and notional bracket.
  3. calculate leverage as 1 ÷ (distance + MMR), then check that it does not exceed the bracket’s maximum leverage.
show the table
BTC leverage implied by selected isolated-liq distances
target distanceBinance at 0.4% MMRBybit at 0.33% MMR
5%18.52x18.76x
2%41.67x42.92x
1%71.43x75.19x

source: arithmetic from BTC first-tier MMR values verified 2026-09-19

what does the simplified liquidation formula ignore?

the formula leaves out fees, funding and cross-margin PnL — at 50x a Binance taker round trip is already 5% of margin.

read more

the equation is an isolated-margin approximation. It ignores unrealised PnL on other positions because that balance matters under cross margin, not a self-contained isolated position. It also omits collateral transfers and any change to available margin after entry. Under cross, the same entry, leverage and notional can therefore produce a different live liq as the rest of the account moves.

accrued fees and funding are also outside the approximation. Binance funding intervals are 8 hours, and Bybit funding intervals are 8 hours in the supplied venue data. The baseline taker fees listed here are 0.05% for Binance and 0.055% for Bybit. At 50x, the stated taker round trips equal 5% and 5.5% of margin respectively, although the amount actually accrued depends on fills and account terms.

mark price is the relevant reference for the venue’s liquidation process, while a chart or order trigger may be configured around another price type. Conditional-order trigger type is selectable and varies by product and interface, so it must be checked on the account. A last-price wick and the venue’s mark can print differently without implying that the liquidation engine used the chart price.

  • cross-margin equity, including unrealised PnL on other positions, is not included.
  • fees, funding accruals and collateral changes since entry are not included.
  • the venue’s live maintenance-margin computation and any bracket change after position adjustment are not included.
  • execution after the liquidation threshold, including book depth and taker fill, is not predicted.

how should you verify the final liquidation number?

run the equation with your exact bracket, then compare it with the venue’s displayed liq — the venue’s live number is final.

read more

every liquidation figure on this page is an estimate — exchanges compute exact liq from live margin; always double-check on your venue. The account display has access to live collateral, accrued funding, fees and the venue’s current risk settings. Those inputs can shift the operative threshold away from a static equation calculated only from entry, leverage and bracket MMR.

a clean check starts with the exact symbol, margin mode, side, entry, notional and current bracket. For isolated margin, run the long or short equation with the verified MMR, then compare it with the venue’s displayed liq. For cross margin, treat the isolated equation as a reference only because account-wide equity and other unrealised PnL are deliberately absent.

liqsiren’s liquidation calculator uses the same isolated long and short equations with real Binance and Bybit maintenance-margin brackets. Its output includes liq price and distance, while separate position-size and funding-cost calculators cover contracts and carrying cost. The liquidation output retains the venue-check disclosure because the exchange’s live margin engine remains the final computation.

what this page adds that the others don't

show all 6
  • Binance BTC at $10,000 notional uses 0.4% MMR, while Bybit BTC uses 0.33% MMR inside each venue’s first $300,000 bracket.
  • at a $97,400 BTC entry, the 0.07 percentage-point MMR gap creates a constant $68.18 difference between the worked Binance and Bybit liq estimates.
  • a Binance BTC long moves from $88,049.60 at 10x to $95,841.60 at 50x, compressing distance from 9.6% to 1.6%.
  • a 5% estimated BTC liq distance implies 18.52x with Binance’s 0.4% MMR and 18.76x with Bybit’s 0.33% MMR.
  • Binance BTC reaches 2% MMR by the listed $70,000,000 bracket, while Bybit’s fifth listed BTC bracket reaches 0.67% at $3,800,000.
  • cross margin, funding accruals and taker fees are excluded from the isolated formula, so the venue’s live margin engine remains the final liq computation.

faq

is liquidation price based only on leverage?

no. leverage supplies the 1/leverage term, but entry price and bracket MMR also enter the isolated equation. Notional matters because it selects the maintenance-margin bracket and maximum leverage. Under cross margin, account equity and unrealised PnL on other positions add further inputs that the isolated approximation does not contain.

why are my Binance and Bybit liquidation prices different at the same leverage?

the venues can assign different MMR values to the same symbol and notional. At $10,000 BTC notional, Binance uses 0.4% and Bybit uses 0.33% in the verified first brackets. With a $97,400 entry, that 0.07 percentage-point gap changes the worked liq estimates by $68.18.

how do I calculate liquidation distance as a percentage?

subtract the estimated long liq from entry, then divide by entry; for a short, subtract entry from the estimated liq and divide by entry. Under the simplified isolated formula, the percentage distance is 1/leverage − MMR. At Binance 20x with 0.4% MMR, that is 0.05 − 0.004 = 4.6%.

does a higher maintenance-margin rate move liquidation closer?

yes. for a long, a higher MMR raises the estimated liq price toward entry; for a short, it lowers the estimated liq toward entry. It also reduces percentage distance because distance equals 1/leverage − MMR. Crossing into a higher notional bracket can therefore move liq even when entry and selected leverage do not change.

why does the venue show a different number from the formula?

the formula is an estimate that omits live account inputs. The venue can include current margin, accrued funding, fees, collateral changes and cross-position PnL where applicable. It also applies its own live risk settings. Estimate — exchanges compute exact liq from live margin; always double-check on your venue.

sources

  1. Binance futures leverage and margin brackets (the bracket API behind the official page) — checked 2026-09-19
  2. Binance Futures liquidation and maintenance margin documentation — checked 2026-09-19
  3. Bybit v5 market risk-limit endpoint (risk limit / maintenance margin tiers) — checked 2026-09-19
  4. Bybit liquidation process documentation — checked 2026-09-19
  5. Bybit mark price documentation — checked 2026-09-19
  6. liqsiren margin-tier table, verified against both venues — checked 2026-09-19

methodology, coverage gaps and the resolved prediction scorecard live on the would-have-alerted audit. corrections: @ehivedev on Telegram.